Today's editorial is one among several published by newspapers across upstate New York today, on the inaction by the State Legislature as it supposedly confronts a ballooning deficit. We see the citizen push to stop the mandatory purchase of new license plates as a message to lawmakers that fees and taxes aren't acceptable as solutions -- and, once again, call on lawmakers to get serious about spending cuts.
Upstate Focus asks newspapers to reach their own conclusions independently, but then to publish an editorial on an agreed-upon topic on a specific day. Here's what the project's newspapers are saying today:
Insist that state lawmakers clean up fiscal mess.
What unmitigated gall!
and one another.
New Yorkers must take charge. Just as more than 100,000 citizens signed petitions to force state lawmakers to rethink a $25 increase on license plates, they must now
make their voices heard on closing the $3.2 billion mid-year state budget deficit.
past nine days, lawmakers continue to dither. With no regard for the fact that the
state could soon run out of money, majority Democrats in the Senate and Assembly
have refused to act on Paterson’s deficit reduction plan or one of their own.
taxes on Indian reservations as a solution. But success with that option is unlikely
anytime soon.
Can’t lawmakers hear the steady creep of red ink that’s already flooding such states
as
woes, lawmakers in the
What’s
wait until the forced shutdown of services such as libraries and parks.
So at a cost to taxpayers of $35,000 a day, lawmakers are sitting around
essentially nothing. Contact your legislators and insist that they get
this fiscal mess. Now!
Stopping the plates
As
Consider it a warning shot. For many people who think there's no use in complaining to Albany about tax and fee increases because it falls on deaf ears, the fact that protests triggered enough bipartisan lawmaker reaction to threaten a $25 new license plate requirement should be as worrisome to the Legislature as it should be encouraging to citizens.
Call it an epiphany or call it political clout but when elected officials, including the governor, tuned into the disharmony voiced by taxpayers and county clerks on the issue of having to pay $25 for new license plates after April 1, the message got through loud and clear. New Yorkers have had enough.
Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, D-Manhattan, and Minority Leader Brian M. Kolb, R-Canandaigua, sent out a rare joint statement stating that the Assembly agreed to act to repeal the requirement. Senate Republicans, many of whom represent upstate motorists who commute to work and need vehicles to get around their respective towns, villages and cities, already had been pushing -- without much effect, until taxpayers weighed in.
Gov. David A. Paterson, who has been vocal about running for re-election, was willing to back away from the new license plates, but he raised a valid point about the need to find budget cuts to replace the license plate revenues -- an anticipated $129 million from vehicle owners.
And there's the rub. So far, the Legislature has failed utterly to muster the political will to make hard choices.
Nearly every American, whatever his or her individual financial status, has learned to cut back during the worst recession since the 1930s. And now
For individuals, the proposed $25 license plate fee, immediate and real, may have been the straw that broke the camel's back -- and triggered outrage, where the billions of dollars in remote and seemingly abstract deficits could not.
Paterson says he now plans to eliminate the license plate requirement, on the important condition that lawmakers and others find other ways to make up for the loss of anticipated revenues before he releases his proposed budget for the fiscal year beginning April 1.
If it remains undone, one of two things will happen:
State legislators must make lasting budget cuts now
What further evidence do state legislators need that
Gov. David Paterson has been pounding on the issue for well over a year. State Comptroller
It is troubling that many legislators want to rely on "one-shot" solutions — like refinancing tobacco settlement money — that would only make things worse in the long run.
For years,
Carl Kruger, Democratic chair of the Senate Finance Committee, has accused the governor of hyping the crisis by creating a "doomsday scenario." But facts are facts and numbers are numbers.
It is useless to hope that better times will eliminate the need for tough decisions. Forecasts call for continued high unemployment through next year, meaning continued low tax revenues. And at the end of next year, the state will be without the crutch of federal stimulus money.
Our legislators are good at acting tough when it is comfortable for them — witness their piling-on over the license plate replacement fiasco.
No action
When will Legislators respond to crisis?
New Yorkers correctly perceive that their governor is trying to deal with the state’s economic crisis in a direct and responsible manner.
He is doing so in the face of opposition, denial and disorder from the New York State Legislature.
Gov. Paterson has sounded the alarm for weeks about a $3.2 billion budget deficit that needs to be closed. He has warned that failure to grapple with the deficit now could lead to a $9 billion deficit at the beginning of the next fiscal year in April.
But trouble will come earlier than that. Next month, the state will be unable to pay its bills if the deficit is not tamed first. If that happens,
State Comptroller
How have the legislators responded?
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Carl Kruger, D-Brooklyn, rejects Gov. Paterson’s argument, contending that the state “absolutely” won’t run out of cash, as the governor suggests will happen without deficit reduction. Others, such as Senate Majority Leader Pedro Espada, D-Bronx, agree that the state’s pockets are deeper than the governor and comptroller imagine.
Sen. Kruger and others suggest collecting cigarette taxes on
A license plate replacement plan approved by the Legislature would have provided $129 million, but popular opposition to that caused the legislators to reconsider.
Gov. Paterson has said that $700 million in midyear school aid cuts are necessary as part of deficit reduction. Senate Republicans and Democrats have stood foursquare against that.
Nor will they accept the governor’s proposed cuts in health care.
What will they accept? Inaction is unacceptable.
No one wants to trim anything from the state budget. But a day of reckoning grows ever nearer.
Gov. Paterson has said: “It’s about saving our house.” Speaking about aid to education and health care last week, he observed: “Ideologically, my deficit reduction plan goes against everything I have fought for for 20 years.
Let’s hope some legislators are listening and willing to do what is right for
Wasting time in
What if every New Yorker went to work one day, didn’t do what the job required, still got paid and came back the next day — possibly for a repeat? Unlikely? Not for the
Worse yet, they seem to be ignoring Paterson, who has tried to tackle the budget crisis facing the state by proposing some $1.3 billion in mid-year spending cuts, primarily in education and health care,
Voters complained loudly back in June about the Senate’s inaction and even threatened to get even at the polls in 2010. Don’t be surprised if they do the same after this latest round of dysfunction. But neither voters nor lawmakers can afford to wait for political judgment day next year.
Instead, a strategy offering greater financial relief must be enacted immediately.
State wastes time and money
State leaders are going to have to do better, fast. And Gov. David Paterson is at least showing more backbone by demanding lawmakers continue to come back to try to deal with the mounting budget deficit. What’s more, the governor did something we haven’t seen nearly enough of in
He took on his own political party.
He specifically cited the Senate’s Democratic majority for failing to “cut a dime from anybody” and, instead, proposing unrealistic one-shot revenue gimmicks to close the $3.2 billion budget deficit.
So far this year, state leaders managed to pass a budget that increased spending from $121 billion to $131 billion regardless of any sensible concerns about the recession and the lack of revenue to pay for what they approved.
So, if that is the case? Why put it off?
tagged
Editorials