Think Eliot Spitzer couldn't sink any lower? Think again.
Now he's a member of the press, sort of (gasp!).
"He's going to be doing a regular thing," Slate Editor Jacob Weisberg told the New York Observer. "It'll be heavily about the financial crisis and fixing financial markets and the economy generally."
In his first column, Spitzer criticized the federal bailout of the financial sector.
Wrote the former governor:
What are we getting for the trillions of dollars in rescue funds? If we are merely extending a fatally flawed status quo, we should invest those dollars elsewhere.
Nobody disputes that radical action was needed to forestall total collapse. But we are creating the significant systemic risk not just of rewarding imprudent behavior by private actors but of preventing, through bailouts and subsidies, the process of creative destruction that capitalism depends on.
A more sensible approach would focus not just on rescuing pre-existing financial institutions but, instead, on creating a structure for more contained and competitive ones.
From lawyer to politician to Client No. 9 to member of the fourth estate. Talk about a downward spiral.
Actually, when it comes to misconduct on Wall Street and how to deal with the fallout, I'm interested in what Spitzer has to say, no matter his private peccadilloes. I suspect I'm far from alone.
Actually, when you think about it, given what's transpired on Wall Street the past few months, Spitzer would have been an especially well suited governor -- if he hadn't messed up.
On a related front, ProPublica is maintaining this running tally of bailout recipients and providing a good roundup of continuing coverage. It's worth checking out.

