By Jerry Zremski
WASHINGTON -- Last week offered only a couple major votes in the House, including yet another near-party-line vote on repealing the Obama health care law. Meanwhile the Senate passed a water resources bill with little controversy.
Here's a closer look at how local members of Congress voted, courtesy of Targeted News Service:
HOUSE VOTES:
House Vote 1:
BLUE ALERT NETWORK: The House has passed
the National Blue Alert Act
(H.R. 180), sponsored by Rep. Michael G. Grimm,
R-N.Y. The bill would
establish at the Justice Department a national Blue
Alert communications
network to issue information when a law enforcement
officer is seriously
injured or killed in the line of duty. Grimm said the
network "will
notify the media and the public so that we can have the help
that we
need to aid in the apprehension of some of the most violent
criminals."
The vote, on May 14, was 406 yeas to 2 nays.
YEAS: Rep. Chris
Collins R-NY (27th), Rep. Brian Higgins D-NY (26th),
Rep. Tom Reed R-NY
(23rd)
House Vote 2:
REPEALING HEALTH CARE REFORM: The House has
passed a bill (H.R. 45),
sponsored by Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., that
would repeal the 2010
health care reform law, also known as Obamacare.
Bachmann said health
care reform consisted of "a lot of promises that can't
be fulfilled.
Before we go forward with this train wreck, let's make sure it
ends so
we can bring about cures, so we can bring about better developments
in
health care." An opponent, Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., said the
bill
would "add to the deficit, and they send us back to the days
when
insurance companies were in charge, costs were skyrocketing, and tens
of
millions either had no coverage--especially if they had
preexisting
conditions--or coverage that they could depend on." The vote, on
May 16,
was 229 yeas to 195 nays.
YEAS: Rep. Chris Collins R-NY (27th),
Rep. Tom Reed R-NY (23rd)
NAYS: Rep. Brian Higgins D-NY (26th)
SENATE
VOTES:
Senate Vote 1:
REGULATING WATER PROJECTS: The Senate has
rejected an amendment
sponsored by Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., to the Water
Resources
Development Act (S. 601). The amendment would have barred guidance
for
the Environmental Protection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers
to
adopt an expanded definition of waters of the United States.
Barrasso
said the guidance would allow ditches and other small drainage
projects
to be regulated by the federal government, which "would grant
the
Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Corps of
Engineers
virtually unlimited--virtually unlimited--regulatory control over
all
wet areas within a State." An opponent, Sen. Barbara A. Boxer,
D-Calif.,
said: "For decades the Clean Water Act has provided broad
protections
for the Nation's waters. The Barrasso amendment stops the corps
from
restoring these longstanding protections, leaving many waters at
risk."
The vote, on May 14, was 52 yeas to 44 nays, with a
three-fifths
majority required for approval.
NAYS: Sen. Kirsten E.
Gillibrand D-NY, Sen. Charles E. Schumer D-NY
Senate Vote 2:
BEACH
RENOURISHMENT TIMELINE: The Senate has rejected an amendment
sponsored by
Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., to the Water Resources
Development Act (S. 601).
The amendment would have eliminated a bill
provision to extend federal
funding for beach renourishment projects
from 50 years to 65 years. An
opponent, Sen. Barbara A. Mikulski, D-Md.,
said beach renourishment projects
help limit damage from hurricanes and
other storms while also sustaining
recreational use of beaches. The
vote, on May 15, was 43 yeas to 53
nays.
NAYS: Sen. Kirsten E. Gillibrand D-NY, Sen. Charles E. Schumer
D-NY
Senate Vote 3:
REVIEWING WATER PROJECTS: The Senate has rejected
an amendment sponsored
by Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., to the Water Resources
Development Act (S.
601). The amendment would have removed restrictions on
the authority of
the Infrastructure Deauthorization Commission to recommend
the
cancellation of water projects. Coburn said excluding projects that
have
begun since 1996 from the commission's authority would protect
special
interests and allow wasteful projects to go forward. An opponent,
Sen.
Barbara A. Boxer, D-Calif., said the amendment would allow projects
"to
be stopped midstream--active projects, projects that have local
funds
flowing into them and private funds flowing into them." The vote, on
May
15, was 35 yeas to 61 nays.
NAYS: Sen. Kirsten E. Gillibrand D-NY,
Sen. Charles E. Schumer D-NY
Senate Vote 4:
BUY AMERICAN RULE FOR
WATER PROJECTS: The Senate has passed an amendment
sponsored by Sen. Jeff
Merkley, D-Ore., to the Water Resources
Development Act (S. 601). The
amendment would require the use of
American iron, steel, and manufactured
goods for water infrastructure
pilot projects. Merkley said: "It makes sense
for American business, for
the American economy, for our workers to do as
much of the work as
possible to create that supply chain in America." An
opponent, Sen. Mike
Lee, R-Utah, said the requirement "could increase the
cost of materials
in some Federal projects by close to 25 percent." The vote,
on May 15,
was 60 yeas to 36 nays.
YEAS: Sen. Kirsten E. Gillibrand D-NY,
Sen. Charles E. Schumer D-NY
Senate Vote 5:
WATER PROJECTS: The Senate
has passed the Water Resources Development
Act (S. 601), sponsored by Sen.
Barbara A. Boxer, D-Calif. The bill
would authorize Army Corps of Engineers
projects to improve the
transportation and navigability of U.S. waterways and
develop water
resources. Boxer said the projects were needed to prevent
flooding, ease
the movement of goods between ports, and improve the
environmental
quality of bodies of water such as the Everglades and
Chesapeake Bay.
The vote, on May 15, was 83 yeas to 14 nays.
YEAS: Sen.
Kirsten E. Gillibrand D-NY, Sen. Charles E. Schumer D-NY
Senate Vote
6:
CONFIRMING DISTRICT JUDGE FOR CALIFORNIA: The Senate has confirmed
the
nomination of William H. Orrick III to serve as a U.S. District
Judge
for the Northern District of California. A supporter, Sen.
Dianne
Feinstein, D-Calif., cited Orrick's 25 years of experience as
a
commercial lawyer in San Francisco and four years of
experience
overseeing the Office of Immigration Litigation at the
Justice
Department. Feinstein said Orrick "has proven throughout his career
that
he has the intellect, skill, and temperament to do an outstanding job
on
the Federal bench in San Francisco." An opponent, Sen. Chuck
Grassley,
R-Iowa, said: "I was troubled by his intervention in Utah,
Arizona,
South Carolina, and Alabama. In those States he led the effort to
strike
down the statutes in those States addressing the Federal
Government's
failure to enforce immigration laws." The vote, on May 15, was
56 yeas
to 41 nays.
YEAS: Sen. Kirsten E. Gillibrand D-NY, Sen. Charles E.
Schumer D-NY
Senate Vote 7:
CONFIRMING ENERGY SECRETARY: The Senate
has confirmed the nomination of
Ernest J. Moniz to serve as Energy Secretary.
A supporter, Sen. Ron
Wyden, D-Ore., cited Moniz's experience as an Energy
Department official
during the Clinton administration, professor at the
Massachusetts
Institute of Technology, and director of MIT's energy
initiative. Wyden
said Moniz "is well qualified to spearhead our efforts to
evolve our
country's energy system, to increase domestic sources, emit less
carbon,
and to bolster our economy." The vote, on May 16, was unanimous with
97
yeas.
YEAS: Sen. Kirsten E. Gillibrand D-NY, Sen. Charles E. Schumer
D-NY